Tuesday, 31 January 2017

Some People Can't Even Get Their Black Propaganda Right...



Another day another allegation and from another halfwit. A short time ago I was sent a screen shot of a post by Mickey Donnelly from Derry alleging that not only had I hacked his account, attempted to hack his account on numerous occasions, set up an Instagram account in his name using my name, and that I am writing letters to the Derry Journal in his name. Phew, I don’t know where I get the time!!! 
 Now, I’m just wondering if I did all this just after I admitted to shooting JFK, or before I admitted to poisoning Alexander Litvinenko?

From all these allegations, it’s a wonder Kim Jong-il and Vladimir Putin aren’t beating my door in to offer me a job!

Shortly after I received the screenshot my husband visited the Derry Journal office and spoke to the Editor of the paper.

He showed Mr.Duffy the editor a screenshot of Mickey Donnelly’s facebook post on Dixie Elliot’s Facebook page, you can see this below.

Closed Kangaroo Court of Dixie!!


Now here are the facts:

1. The Derry Journal has confirmed there was a letter sent to the Derry Journal ‘claiming’ to be from Mickey Donnelly, it provided contact details, telephone number and home address. As the content was ‘bog standard republican fare’ and the contact details were all provided the Journal did not feel it necessary to contact Mickey for verification.


2. A time later, Mickey Donnelly telephoned the Derry Journal claiming he did not send the letter, that he would be contacting his solicitor and demanded they trace the i.p. address. The Derry Journal have not heard from Mickey Donnelly’s solicitor.



3. The Derry Journal I.T. team are not tracing and have never been tracing any i.p. address as this for them is a non-issue. Moreover, as this is not the role of the Derry Journal, the question is have Mickey or his legal team contacted the PSNI?

4. That I am capable of ‘hacking’ anything is laughable.



5. That I have any interest in what Michael Donnelly does outside of attempting to blacken my name is even more laughable.



6.Truth be told, Michael Donnelly’s attack on me stems from my supporting Dr. Anne McCloskey in the 2016 Stormont election.



7. In a previous blog, I had addressed other allegations and innuendo from Dixie Elliot who has also been attempting to blacken my name. Dixie Elliot also took issue with me supporting Dr. Anne McCloskey in the 2016 Stormont election. Oddly now that these attacks are happening in the advance of an election.



8. With republicans amongst others raising the issue of closed material proceedings being used, that two republicans feel that trial by facebook is acceptable beggars belief. But then this is clearly all they have to offer.



9. That two big republicans must resort to online character assassination instead of addressing any issue they have with me in person is pathetic.



Mr Donnelly knows where I live. I was at the Bloody Sunday March for Justice at the weekend, had he have wanted to speak to me or confront me he could have. The fact that he didn't  confirms to me that this is a mere attempt to blacken my name.



If Mr Donnelly and Mr Elliot wish to sit down with me with an agreed neutral mediator and present evidence to substantiate their litany of ridiculous allegations, then I welcome it. I’ll go further, if they would like to open their Kangaroo closed court to the public then let’s agree the mediator and the location. However until such times as these gentlemen grow a pair  I will be ignoring everything else they have to throw. 

Ps, The rumour that I sank the titanic is untrue and for the record I was not steering it with a rowing boat. 

Sunday, 29 January 2017

Setting The Truth Free.

(Not to be republished without prior consent)

When I decided a few years back that I was going to start blogging I was acutely aware of several things, firstly that I, because of my blogs would be subject to scrutiny, and secondly that I would need to ensure that what I published was corroborated and substantiated with reliable sources at every opportunity.  This is something I have strived to do with every post, and something I will continue to do.


I am, as a friend would say, no shrinking violet, capable of articulating and debating my view point and as with anyone who publishes a blog or any form of communication I stand to be challenged on what I put out for public consumption. That said being challenged over a position and being attacked by someone online are two completely different things.


For a few months now I have been subjected to allegation and innuendo through social media, the person leading this charge has made a range of accusations both publicly and in private message. The interesting thing is that this ‘man’ has at no time attempted to speak to me directly. No instead this ‘man’ deleted and blocked me from his facebook before launching his campaign. Now I could have rationalised that this behaviour is misogynistic, and potentially that this person may be emotionally unwell but I think that this would be trying to provide some element of justification for his behaviours when in truth whilst we have rights such as freedom of speech and freedom of thought and conscience there is no justification for what is considered cyber-harassment.


This cyber-harassment took several forms, it involved contacting different friends of mine through private message and making allegations against me. Well until a recent escalation when he started to name me on public threads on social media in a conversation about 'shit stirrers'.  Friends of mine this ‘man’ has been in contact with have been kind enough to provide me with screen shots of the messages. Not only that, when they told this ‘man’ they would be passing these to me he was indifferent to this.


When discussing this matter with people one question that has been asked of me is why as this has been going on for some time have I waited until now to address it? There are two reasons for this: 


Firstly this began a few months ago. During this my father was critically ill and my time was spent supporting my mother and visiting him in hospital in Belfast, so needless to say this person was not at the top of my priority list.


Secondly, I wanted to try and address this matter directly with the person responsible. I firmly believe that if you have an issue with someone, or they have an issue with you then both parties should have the strength of their convictions to sit down and discuss whatever the problem is. They may agree, they may agree to disagree or they may not move anyway forward but at least it provides both sides with the opportunity to have their say. Although I must say that when you challenge people who make unsubstantiated allegations to sit down face to face and discuss them with you they generally can’t stand over the venomous bile they have been spouting and will refuse to meet you. However, I thought I would try to speak to this person and try and resolve this before it escalated.


Through a mutual friend, I sent an email to Derry man Thomas ‘Dixie’ Elliot requesting to meet him to challenge him as to why he was continuously attacking me and attempting to blacken my name.  Among other things Dixie has accused me of ‘shit stirring’.  I have asked him to explain and have included the caveat who, what, when and where? Adding “Four simple words, so your response should be easy enough to compose. And before you do this do bear in mind that 'I think', 'I believe', 'I was told by x' person does not constitute proof.”


Dixie also stated that I or my shit stirring was to be exposed, one week on from his receiving my letter I await Dixie’s expose. Furthermore, I also offered Dixie the opportunity to post his response unedited on this blog. To date Dixie has not taken me up on my offer, has not published a response elsewhere or responded to my letter.
Dixie has also accused me of playing people like a fiddle, now I’m not musically inclined, but as to who I was playing like a fiddle and when was also not substantiated. I must admit at this point I thought Jesus this ejit thinks I’m some sort of modern day Mata Hari!


In the midst of his ramblings Dixie made the accusation of an Mi5 smear against the Bloody Sunday March for Justice and the organisers.  When challenged by a friend he named me in a private message as being responsible for this. Despite this he has refused to explain or substantiate this allegation despite it being very serious and dangerous in nature.

A thread which was later removed.


One week before the 40th
Anniversary March
Dixie maybe isn’t aware of this but  in 2012 a lot of the organising for 40th anniversary Bloody Sunday March took place in my house, indeed it is a matter of record that Kate Nash actually thanked me from the platform on that day.  Also, anyone who knows me will be aware that I have been very supportive of the March for Justice, a cursory check on my facebook will show that each year I promote the march and even earlier this week I published a video that called on people to attend this year’s march.


Following a meeting in Stormont
Supporting Helen

On top of this Kate Nash, Linda Nash and Helen Deery (the three grannies as we called them) will be able to confirm the help and support I gave to them with their endeavors, not just with the March for Justice but with their campaign against the slipping of the flawed ‘legacy’ legislation through the back door. I’ve never publicly stated my role until now, but I was central to the arranging of public meetings, arranging and supporting the girls to attend private meetings with a range of politicians including the then Justice Minister David Ford. I wrote the statements they issued, generated the posters and issued press releases and advertisements for the events they held, the banners they carried and the very banner images they still use on social media. And not only will they be able to confirm all of this but my own email records can corroborate everything above.





Dixie, considering some of the support I have outlined above, for you to attempt to blacken my name and character by suggesting that I would in any way attack the Bloody Sunday March for Justice or the organisers is nothing short of contemptible. And I would like you to explain your actions, it’s bad enough that the British state supported by agencies such as Mi5 use closed material proceedings against people here giving them no opportunity to defend themselves, but for a former republican prisoner and one who has spoken out against the actions of the state to do something similar just beggars belief.



Despite this Dixie, I will once again extend the offer to meet with you to discuss your allegations oh and feel free to bring someone with you. I am also once again extending the offer for you to respond using my blog, that said I do expect you to substantiate your claims. And if I have done something wrong then I will say I’m wrong and apologise regardless of how you choose to conduct yourself.

There are so many issues needing addressed in our city and despite our different political perspectives I believe our energies and talents should be used more positively and productively. I do not intend to enter some protracted ‘he said, she said’ nonsense. The evidence we either can or cannot produce should validate our positions.

Dixie,  I do hope to hear from you but I can assure you that I for one will not be subject to the closed kangaroo court of Dixie.
















Wednesday, 11 January 2017

Soundbites and Crystal Balls

.


The prospect of another assembly election just months after the last has me far from excited this despite my known love of elections. If anything the very idea has me worried. As I said in my last blog the likelihood of another election solving any issue in the interim period or delivering anything other than the same sh!t on a different shovel is highly unlikely. And lets just say another election is called and Arlene again becomes First Minister with her having topped the poll last time around and with unionist voters known for their tactical voting then what then? Another election? Direct rule?


Those of you reading this blog will often see a reference from me to the politics of deflection. My worry is that in the absence of a Stormont Assembly things that require local scrutiny may slip through the back door of Westminster. Things such as the Bedroom tax. 





Another important issue is the need for legislation to deal with the past, given the urgency around funding for inquests. Funding which is being withheld on an all or nothing basis despite the British Governments legal obligation to deal with the past.

In the last attempt to deal with the past the related legislation was to bypass Stormont and go straight to Westminster despite the subsequent denials of the politician. 

In an opinion piece from Ann Cadwallader of the Pat Finucane Centre (Human Rights Organisation) which was published in the Irish News on 28 February 2015 Ms Cadwallader had this to say in respect of the Stormont House Agreement;

It is heartening that party leaders are meeting to discuss the SHA every Monday indicating a certain level of urgency.”

“The legislation required for this jurisdiction is to be handed over to Westminster. The rationale is that it will pass quicker through the House of Commons than through the bear-pit up at Stormont.”


Despite the further concerns outlined in the article from Ann Cadwallader the above information backed up what victims and campaigners were later demonised for highlighting.

When elements of the the proposed legislation were eventually leaked to the public by the press only then did the politicians raise issue with the proposals. This despite the main parties having the document long before it reached the press. A leak which proved that the legislation was loaded in favour of the state in that it gave carte blanche to the Secretary of State via the national security card, and as such offered little to victims seeking truth and justice.


Having voiced my related suspicions to my husband a few days ago I decided to let my thoughts percolate that was until I read the statement published yesterday, January 10 2017, from Sinn Fein's Gerry Kelly.

In his statement Mr Kelly who is the party spokesperson on legacy said:






With the  the urgency outlined in respect of money for legacy inquests and keeping in mind that Sinn Fein are the driving force behind the proposed election which will see the assembly dissolve and return no sooner than March, then what must be asked of Mr Kelly in respect of his last comment which states: "they need to implement the Stormont House agreed legacy mechanisms in a human rights compliant manner,"  is, who are the 'they'?

Is there another plan to hand this over to Westminster (as was the case with welfare reform) in the absence of an assembly and in the absence of a robust consultation with all victims, as opposed to a piece meal tick box exercise? Particularly with the DUP's Jeffrey Donaldson suggesting that the north is facing a prolonged period of direct rule. In contrast Sinn Fein's Gerry Adams has said that a return to direct rule is not an option.


The fact is that when Adams is saying that direct rule is not an option can he guarantee the formation of an executive after the election? Has he a crystal ball? By the same token, is Jeffrey (who could do a nifty sideline as a Daniel O'Donnell impersonator) being all doom and gloom because to put it bluntly 'fear sells'.

Outside of outstanding issues in this election there are fewer seats to be gained, and this is something that everyone should be concerned about. This will no doubt impact on the smaller parties who make up the opposition both official and otherwise, and will therefore make Stormont less inclusive than it already is.  As much as I think Stormont and the majority of those who roam it's marble corridors are useless, if the smaller parties do take a knock then there will be absolutely nothing and no one to hold the DUP & Sinn Fein to account. And if you take it on the basis of votes, then this is sadly democracy.

Now on the subject of democracy, other spectres looming are Brexit and austerity. In his resignation letter former Deputy First Minister Martin McGuinness states that the British Government are imposing austerity & brexit against the wishes and best interests of the people here. Now Martin, before you get ahead of yourself, I would remind you that Sinn fein, yes your party, voted to hand the powers of welfare reform to the Tories, so before you accuse them don't forget your own role in that. And as for Brexit, well as someone who voted to remain I was shocked at the outcome, but unfortunately that's democracy. And if Martin casts his mind back to 1998 and the Good Friday Agreement, well that cemented the North into the UK. We might not like the Brexit outcome, but can we pick and choose when to support democracy? If so more people in my house voted against the current regime in Stormont than for it, so does this mean we should be able to secede from a democratic vote?


For my own part, should an election arise, I will be voting on a realistic and tactical basis to send the main parties a clear message and would encourage others to do the same. And, outside of that I'm exploring the options on how I can secede from the North and set up the Peoples Democratic Republic of my house.


Thursday, 5 January 2017

Confusing Misogyny with Incompetency



I feel it fair to say that 2016 is a year I’ll never forget. Towards the end of the year critical illness paid our family a visit, with a close relative following his unexpected collapse requiring three major surgeries, one of which has had a life changing impact. Although this has been a difficult time for us this whole experience has helped put life into perspective in that today I refuse to sweat the small stuff or tolerate those with short memories, small-minds or cold hearts.




Now enough about me. Never known to fail, I see our friends in Stormont are doing a fantastic job exposing how useless they really are. Following my short break I return to blogging once again finding that the politicians have made my past analysis of them seem overly fair, optimistic even and at a push generous! If recent events are anything to go by then Stormont truly is as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike. And, as the limelight continues to be hogged with one fiasco after another we must question what deals are being done in the background.

 







As far as I’m aware the Stormont budget was due to be published in December  2016, now unless I’ve overlooked it, I can’t find it anywhere. So, a question is, if this has not been published then why not? Another question is, will the costs incurred via the heating scandal have an impact on the money required for public services? And ultimately, does anyone up there really know what they are doing?




Now to the latest Stormont scandal (yes another one) which involves quite literally burning taxpayer’s money. This is of course the Renewable Heating Incentive, a heating scheme which allows the participants to heat their butts whilst receiving £1.60 for every £1 spent. This scheme set up in 2012 is set to cost taxpayer up to an approximate £500 million in the coming years through a failure to evaluate the cost and potential consequences of such a clearly overly generous offer. In the spotlight for this mess has been The First Minister Arlene Foster who was the former Minister for Enterprise Trade and Investment when the scheme was established. Despite her department being responsible for setting the scheme up, making a complete bollix of it, and being warned of the flaws by a whistleblower Arlene says she’s not done anything wrong. Can you imagine if this was a department in a business losing a few hundred million quid?










You might remember the ‘Hoover’ free flights fiasco in the early 1990’s, buy a Hoover product for over £100 and get 2 free airline tickets? Too good to be true, well unfortunately for Hoover it was true and ended up costing the company £48 million quid! The long and the short of this was that despite the scheme being the brainchild of two Hoover Marketing Executives Michael Gilbey and Brian Webb a number of Hoover executives were sacked including William Foust, managing director of Hoover Ltd and president of Hoover Europe.





There have been not so unreasonable calls for Foster to step aside in advance of an inquiry into this scandal from her political opponents but as you would expect big Arlene is staying put and denying all. Indeed she has gone as far as to complain that this is due to misogyny, for such an intelligent woman I cannot understand how she is confusing misogyny with incompetency? I believe that Arlene is following the lead of the DUP’s Nelson McCausland who stood firm over his part in the Red Sky fiasco. In this case McCausland was later found to have acted inappropriately by a Stormont Committee. Subsequently, a motion calling for the assembly to investigate whether McCausland misled the assembly was blocked using the Stormont get out of Gaol card known as the petition of concern. For those who don’t know what a petition of concern is, it’s a veto that can be implemented if 30 MLA’s sign it. So, if a party with 30+ MLA’s disagrees with something in Stormont they just pull out their petition and boom, lights out! In the immortal words of Sheldon Cooper – Bazinga! I doubt the outcome of this latest fiasco will be any different with the petition of concern at the ready.





Now in contrast, Daithi McCay former Sinn Fein MLA took one for the team when he was outsmarted by fleg protestor Jamie Bryson and resigned when it was found he was advising Bryson on how to address a Stormont Committee, Daithi it seems was expendable. McCay’s then party colleague Martin Mr Ó Muilleoir, Finance Minister, refused to stand aside for an investigation after he too was caught up in the Brysongate coaching scandal. At the time Sinn Fein’s Martin McGuinness the Deputy First Minister accused those seeking for Mr Ó Muilleoir to stand aside of engaging in "petty party politicking". Hasn’t Arlene said something similar recently?







In response to the heating scandal I have found some politicians a bit watery, so watery indeed it became difficult to know who was who in that old orange and green zoo. Sinn Fein appear to have lacked the required leadership in this matter, actually, any leadership for that matter with their calls for Arlene to step aside coming a bit late in the day. And not forgetting that in an Assembly no confidence vote in the First Minister Sinn Fein MLA’s didn’t turn up for the vote. No doubt they were all in the toilet!





I would argue that Sinn Fein raised more of a stink over the annual Bonfire in the Bogside and cleaning costs than they have over the burning of hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayer’s money. Sinn Fein’s response to this nonsense has even been questioned by some of their supporters publicly with one supporter in a letter published in the Irish News stating,Sinn Féin should pull theStormont charade down or hang their heads in shame.’ I reckon Mr. Reilly from Belfast who penned the letter has been taken off Gerry & Martin’s Christmas Card list.




The Stormont ‘opposition’ on the other hand have been shouting the loudest on this issue as you would expect. Although when all is said and done they are only shouting. Surely a more effective show of opposition would be for them to take to their heels and walk out. Because, until they have enough numbers between them to out vote the SF/DUP love triangle they’re just pissing into the wind, so to speak. Now think about this, if the 42 MLA’s who make up the opposition official and otherwise walked out, how could Stormont be considered functional with over 45% of the elected representatives refusing to engage? There have been calls for a new election. People Before Profit/SWP were first to voice the need for an election, a call which was later faintly echoed by Sinn Fein. Unless People Before Profit/SWP feel they can make electoral gain as a party then why bother? As surely voting patterns show that the orange and green trend will return the same sh1t on a different shovel.





Now something I have touched upon in this article is how Sinn Fein created more of a stink over a bonfire in the Bogside than the ongoing heating scandal, after all I haven’t heard any Sinn Fein Policing Board members calling for the return of the IRA, to deal with heating incentive miscreants. I haven’t heard those MLA’s and elected representatives who bemoaned the cost of clearing the remains of the Bogside Bonfire speak with the same vigour on the heating scandal. Now don’t get me wrong, I’m no fan of bonfire’s, however I feel had the situation been better dealt with the outcome could have been different.








At the other end of the spectrum was the recent tantrum in the local press by a Sinn Fein member/ community worker who raised concerns about the bonfire cleanup costs yet gave off a stink because some enterprising people had generously given their time to clean up back lanes in and around Elmwood Terrace and the adjoining streets. Why would anyone complain about people cleaning back lanes for free? Well this Sinn Fein member/Community worker represents a community group that was charging people £15 to clean their back passage (Cue Kenneth Williams LOL). Yes, this group will have the weeds in your back alley removed and sprayed, for a fee, so you know where to go for a trim that is if you have £15 to spare.





Finally, I don’t know whether it’s good to be back or not particularly with the sweat running out of me as I write this, thanks to my new wood pellet burning boiler which gives me £1.60 for every £1 I spend (I wish).









Happy New year All.xxx